![gtx 1650 opengl 4.3 gtx 1650 opengl 4.3](https://www.geeks3d.com/public/jegx/2020q1/gpucapsviewer-geexlab-opengl43-comnpute-shaders-demo.jpg)
![gtx 1650 opengl 4.3 gtx 1650 opengl 4.3](https://www.notebookcheck.net/fileadmin/Notebooks/Acer/Nitro_5_GTX_1650/turbo2.jpg)
If someone really wants to game at native 4K and has money to burn, there's substantially more performance to be had there.Īnd there's certainly more than a 5% performance difference separating each card between the 1650 SUPER and the 1660 Ti. Still, a 2080 Ti can be around 40% faster than a 2070 SUPER when not limited by CPU performance, and close to 50% faster than a 5700 XT. The SUPER cards kind of filled in the gaps though, while bringing price reductions with them. 3 levels of performance, and every other card is pointless already.Assuming one is running games at resolutions where they are not CPU-limited, a 2080 Ti tends to be around 20-25% faster than a 2080, and a 2080 in turn around 20-25% faster than a 2070. We got the 1650 Super, then the 5600 XT/RTX2060, then the 5700 XT. And I won't even get started about the low end where everything from the 1650 Super (insert 5 models here) to 1660 super are 5 percent apart. Pointless to buy anything above the 5700 XT right now. Remember when the 1 ti were all 25 percent apart each? Now we have the 2070S, 2080S, and 2080 Ti all on average 15 percent fps apart. the current cards all all way too close together as is.